🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive action to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are watching closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing group of states are considering parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "a potential tools in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to pass a bill raising the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has adopted a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" design of these apps, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a useful starting point," said one European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Approach

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration pledged to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised concerns. A prominent charity established by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the Silicon Valley to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential online safety campaigner.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media use per day, with any further access requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws mandating parental consent for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, further nations are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, international bodies strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

As this global conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers show that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.